Search for: All records

Synopsis During swallowing, a diverse range of mammals—from opossums to humans—propel food boluses out of the oropharynx via tongue base retraction (TBR). The widespread distribution of TBR behavior implies an ancient evolutionary origin, but the biomechanical mechanisms of TBR remain poorly understood. The evolution of TBR behavior is further complicated by the diversity of hyoid and tongue anatomy across mammals: to what extent does hyolingual morphology shape TBR mechanism? Using biplanar videoradiography and the XROMM workflow, we collected high-resolution 3D kinematic data in opossums (Marsupialia), dogs (Placentalia), and macaques (Placentalia) to test hypotheses on the evolutionary conservation of TBR mechanisms. Despite differences in hyolingual morphology and resting hyoid position, both dogs and macaques drive TBR through hyoid movement: hyoid excursions reduce the oral volume and squeeze the tongue base posteriorly, analogous to a hydraulic pump displacing an incompressible fluid. In opossums, however, intrinsic lingual muscles deform the tongue base to initiate TBR, independent of hyoid movement and oral volume change. We suggest that multiple mechanisms are viable for the highly conserved TBR behavior across mammals, and the functional diversity of TBR mechanisms is decoupled from the morphological diversity of the hyolingual system. This decoupling may have facilitated the evolution of novel hyolingual phenotypes while avoiding trade-offs in swallowing performance. 

Abstract Skeletal muscle fibre architecture provides important insights into performance of vertebrate locomotor and feeding behaviours. Chemical digestion and in situ sectioning of muscle bellies along their lengths to expose fibres, fibre orientation and intramuscular tendon, are two classical methods for estimating architectural variables such as fibre length (L_f) and physiological cross‐sectional area (PCSA). It has recently been proposed thatL_festimates are systematically shorter and hence less accurate using in situ sectioning. Here we addressed this hypothesis by comparingL_festimates between the two methods for the superficial masseter and temporalis muscles in a sample of strepsirrhine and platyrrhine primates. Means or single‐specimenL_festimates using chemical digestion were greater in 17/32 comparisons (53.13%), indicating the probability of achieving longer fibres using chemical digestion is no greater than chance in these taxonomic samples. We further explored the impact of sampling on scaling ofL_fand PCSA in platyrrhines applying a bootstrapping approach. We found that sampling—both numbers of individuals within species and representation of species across the clade significantly influence scaling results ofL_fand PCSA in platyrrhines. We show that intraspecific and clade sampling strategies can account for differences between previously published platyrrhine scaling studies. We suggest that differences in these two methodological approaches to assessing muscle architecture are relatively less consequential when estimatingL_fand PCSA for comparative studies, whereas achieving more reliable estimates within species through larger samples and representation of the full clade space are important considerations in comparative studies of fibre architecture and scaling.